Post by sebastiangrey on Oct 24, 2014 1:19:19 GMT
We can take Afghanistan or Iraq metrics for the average casualties per downed bird etc... and apply the same concepts. We do need to decide on amounts etc
Cripples remind me of something I learned in Iraq: against an invading army, you don't necessarily want to kill the enemy. It's better to have them crippled: you can leave a corpse. It's harder to leave behind a dude who's sobbing for his mother as he slowly bleeds out. The insurgencies in Iraq used this is great effect against US soldiers. A crippled soldier requires the government's resources to maintain and is a walking, talking... or at least breathing representation of just why it's a bad idea to f*** with the opposing forces. I can imagine our slow retreat intentionally using weapons that cause lots of cripples, things like IEDs, exploding darts aimed into the legs, punji stakes, etc. etc... it's a devious, underhanded, cruel way of waging war, and it's wonderfully effective.



